# Hy4 preview vs Qwen3.7 Flash

> Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 23× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hy4-preview-vs-qwen3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Hy4 preview scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 55.7 to 38.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 68.2% for Hy4 preview and 43.8% for Qwen3.7 Flash.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.83 / $2.50 for Hy4 preview.
- Hy4 preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
- Hy4 preview has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Hy4 preview | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 45.3 | 39.9 |
| Rank | 73 | 156 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.83 | $0.03 |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | $0.13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Hy4 preview: 51.6 (#38)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1632 | — |

## Reasoning

- Hy4 preview: 31.9 (#79)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 68.2% | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.64 |

## Math

- Hy4 preview: 55.7 (#42)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| ProofBench | 75% | — |

## Knowledge

- Hy4 preview: —
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |

## FAQ

### Is Hy4 preview better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 23× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Hy4 preview or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview lists at $0.83 and $2.50.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Hy4 preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

### How many benchmarks do Hy4 preview and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Hy4 preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.
