# Hy4 preview vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

> Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index. Hy4 preview costs 2.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.6 Max Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hy4-preview-vs-qwen3-6-max-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy4 preview scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.6 Max Preview in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads 41.7 to 31.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 68.2% for Hy4 preview and 74.1% for Qwen3.6 Max Preview.
- Hy4 preview is cheaper at $0.75 / $2.25 per million input/output tokens, against $1.30 / $7.80 for Qwen3.6 Max Preview.
- Hy4 preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- Hy4 preview has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Hy4 preview | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 45.3 | 51.5 |
| Rank | 73 | 43 |
| Context | 1.05M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.75 | $1.30 |
| Output $/M | $2.25 | $7.80 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Hy4 preview: 51.6 (#38)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.7 (#54)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1632 | 1482 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 76.7% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1471 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Hy4 preview: —
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 4,254 |

## Reasoning

- Hy4 preview: 31.9 (#79)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 41.7 (#53)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 68.2% | 74.1% |
| SimpleBench | — | 63% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1457 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 19% |
| DTBench | — | 87.2% |
| LMCA | — | 42.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 149.24 |

## Math

- Hy4 preview: 55.7 (#42)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.1 (#46)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 91.1% |
| ProofBench | 75% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1465 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 23.1% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 4.2% |

## Knowledge

- Hy4 preview: —
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#39)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 52% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1478 |

## Multilingual

- Hy4 preview: —
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.2 (#48)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1437 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1487 |
| LMArena French | — | 1449 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1445 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1454 |

## Instruction Following

- Hy4 preview: —
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.7 (#55)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1438 |

## Long Context

- Hy4 preview: —
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#61)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1457 |

## Writing & Preference

- Hy4 preview: —
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 63.8 (#60)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1447 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1435 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1456 |

## FAQ

### Is Hy4 preview better than Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index. Hy4 preview costs 2.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.6 Max Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Hy4 preview or Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Hy4 preview is cheaper. It lists at $0.75 per million input tokens and $2.25 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 Max Preview lists at $1.30 and $7.80.

### Is Hy4 preview or Qwen3.6 Max Preview better for coding?

Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.6 versus 48.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Hy4 preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Hy4 preview and Qwen3.6 Max Preview share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy4 preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29.