# Hy4 preview vs Qwen3.6 35B-A3B

> Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.6 35B-A3B costs 2.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hy4-preview-vs-qwen3-6-35b-a3b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Hy4 preview scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 55.7 to 38.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 68.2% for Hy4 preview and 41.6% for Qwen3.6 35B-A3B.
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B is cheaper at $0.25 / $1.49 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $2.25 for Hy4 preview.
- Hy4 preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.

## Snapshot

| | Hy4 preview | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 45.3 | 37.6 |
| Rank | 73 | 201 |
| Context | 1.05M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.75 | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | $2.25 | $1.49 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Hy4 preview: 51.6 (#38)
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 37.2 (#196)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1632 | — |
| SciCode | — | 35.8% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.5% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Hy4 preview: —
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 22.1 (#134)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 23% |

## Reasoning

- Hy4 preview: 31.9 (#79)
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 28.0 (#109)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 68.2% | 41.6% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 26% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 22% |
| DTBench | — | 73.9% |
| LMCA | — | 29.7% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 44.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.93 |

## Math

- Hy4 preview: 55.7 (#42)
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 38.9 (#121)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 20.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| ProofBench | 75% | — |

## Knowledge

- Hy4 preview: —
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 51.3 (#68)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.8% |

## FAQ

### Is Hy4 preview better than Qwen3.6 35B-A3B?

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.6 35B-A3B costs 2.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Hy4 preview or Qwen3.6 35B-A3B?

Qwen3.6 35B-A3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.49 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview lists at $0.75 and $2.25.

### Is Hy4 preview or Qwen3.6 35B-A3B better for coding?

Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.6 versus 37.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Hy4 preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Hy4 preview and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Hy4 preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B has 14.