# Hy4 preview vs Qwen3.5 35B-A3B

> Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 42.0 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.5 35B-A3B costs 1.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hy4-preview-vs-qwen3-5-35b-a3b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Hy4 preview scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hy4 preview leads 51.6 to 33.8.
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is cheaper at $0.25 / $2 per million input/output tokens, against $0.83 / $2.50 for Hy4 preview.
- Hy4 preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.

## Snapshot

| | Hy4 preview | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 45.3 | 42.0 |
| Rank | 73 | 123 |
| Context | 1.05M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.83 | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | $2 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Hy4 preview: 51.6 (#38)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 33.8 (#251)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1632 | 1254 |
| SciCode | — | 29.3% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1410 |

## Reasoning

- Hy4 preview: 31.9 (#79)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 24.6 (#161)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 68.2% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0.6% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 10% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1400 |
| DTBench | — | 80% |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 142.52 |

## Math

- Hy4 preview: 55.7 (#42)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 39.9 (#97)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 56% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 70% |
| ProofBench | 75% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1404 |

## Knowledge

- Hy4 preview: —
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 47.8 (#79)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.5% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1408 |

## Multilingual

- Hy4 preview: —
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 50.0 (#127)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1378 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1457 |
| LMArena French | — | 1412 |
| LMArena German | — | 1367 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1376 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1392 |

## Instruction Following

- Hy4 preview: —
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 72.8 (#128)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1379 |

## Long Context

- Hy4 preview: —
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 42.4 (#127)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1389 |

## Writing & Preference

- Hy4 preview: —
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 57.9 (#124)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1346 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1390 |

## FAQ

### Is Hy4 preview better than Qwen3.5 35B-A3B?

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 42.0 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.5 35B-A3B costs 1.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Hy4 preview or Qwen3.5 35B-A3B?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $2 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview lists at $0.83 and $2.50.

### Is Hy4 preview or Qwen3.5 35B-A3B better for coding?

Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.6 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Hy4 preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Hy4 preview and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Hy4 preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B has 28.