# Hy4 preview vs Qwen3 14B

> Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 35.5 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 14B costs 2.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hy4-preview-vs-qwen3-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 55.7 to 38.6.
- Qwen3 14B is cheaper at $0.35 / $1.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.83 / $2.50 for Hy4 preview.
- Hy4 preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Hy4 preview | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 45.3 | 35.5 |
| Rank | 73 | 225 |
| Context | 1.05M | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.83 | $0.35 |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | $1.40 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Hy4 preview: 51.6 (#38)
- Qwen3 14B: 37.3 (#195)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1632 | — |
| SciCode | — | 31.6% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Hy4 preview: —
- Qwen3 14B: 29.6 (#83)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41% |

## Reasoning

- Hy4 preview: 31.9 (#79)
- Qwen3 14B: 18.5 (#280)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.1% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 68.2% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| DTBench | — | 64% |
| LMCA | — | 18.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.23 |

## Math

- Hy4 preview: 55.7 (#42)
- Qwen3 14B: 38.6 (#133)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.4% |
| ProofBench | 75% | — |

## Knowledge

- Hy4 preview: —
- Qwen3 14B: 39.3 (#134)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 63.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.4% |

## Long Context

- Hy4 preview: —
- Qwen3 14B: 38.1 (#204)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.5% |

## FAQ

### Is Hy4 preview better than Qwen3 14B?

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 35.5 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 14B costs 2.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Hy4 preview or Qwen3 14B?

Qwen3 14B is cheaper. It lists at $0.35 per million input tokens and $1.40 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview lists at $0.83 and $2.50.

### Is Hy4 preview or Qwen3 14B better for coding?

Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.6 versus 37.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Hy4 preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Hy4 preview and Qwen3 14B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy4 preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.