# Hy4 preview vs Qwen3-1.7B

> Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.6 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hy4-preview-vs-qwen3-1-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 54.5 to 15.4.

## Snapshot

| | Hy4 preview | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 44.6 | 26.2 |
| Rank | 73 | 331 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.83 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Hy4 preview: 51.4 (#36)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1633 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Hy4 preview: —
- Qwen3-1.7B: 24.5 (#108)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.4% |

## Reasoning

- Hy4 preview: 30.6 (#75)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 18.5 (#263)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 68.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |

## Math

- Hy4 preview: 54.5 (#37)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 15.4 (#288)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
| ProofBench | 75% | — |

## Knowledge

- Hy4 preview: —
- Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#273)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 38% |

## FAQ

### Is Hy4 preview better than Qwen3-1.7B?

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.6 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Hy4 preview and Qwen3-1.7B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy4 preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.