# Hy4 preview vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B

> Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index. Qwen2.5-Coder-32B costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hy4-preview-vs-qwen2-5-coder-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Hy4 preview leads 51.6 to 22.6.
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B is cheaper at $0.66 / $1 per million input/output tokens, against $0.83 / $2.50 for Hy4 preview.
- Hy4 preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 33K.

## Snapshot

| | Hy4 preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 45.3 | 33.4 |
| Rank | 73 | 245 |
| Context | 1.05M | 33K |
| Input $/M | $0.83 | $0.66 |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | $1 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Hy4 preview: 51.6 (#38)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.6 (#333)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 9% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 16.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1632 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 49% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 56.9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1276 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 58% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 87.2% |
| MBPP+ | — | 77% |

## Reasoning

- Hy4 preview: 31.9 (#79)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 21.2 (#225)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 68.2% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 42.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1251 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 49.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 119.49 |
| HellaSwag | — | 83% |
| LiveBench | — | 46.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.8% |

## Math

- Hy4 preview: 55.7 (#42)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.3 (#204)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 75% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 46.6% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1251 |
| GSM8K | — | 93% |

## Knowledge

- Hy4 preview: —
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.4 (#203)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1221 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 70.5% |
| MMLU | — | 79.1% |

## Multilingual

- Hy4 preview: —
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1205 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1222 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1228 |

## Instruction Following

- Hy4 preview: —
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.4 (#245)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.7% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1223 |

## Long Context

- Hy4 preview: —
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#208)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1251 |

## Writing & Preference

- Hy4 preview: —
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.6 (#240)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1230 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1174 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1222 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 23.3% |

## FAQ

### Is Hy4 preview better than Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index. Qwen2.5-Coder-32B costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Hy4 preview or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B is cheaper. It lists at $0.66 per million input tokens and $1 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview lists at $0.83 and $2.50.

### Is Hy4 preview or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better for coding?

Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.6 versus 22.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Hy4 preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 33K.

### How many benchmarks do Hy4 preview and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy4 preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31.