# Hy4 preview vs Qwen Plus

> Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Plus costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hy4-preview-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 55.7 to 23.3.
- Qwen Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.83 / $2.50 for Hy4 preview.
- Hy4 preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
- Hy4 preview has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Hy4 preview | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 45.3 | 37.1 |
| Rank | 73 | 210 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.83 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Hy4 preview: 51.6 (#38)
- Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1632 | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1328 |

## Reasoning

- Hy4 preview: 31.9 (#79)
- Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 68.2% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1317 |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |

## Math

- Hy4 preview: 55.7 (#42)
- Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| ProofBench | 75% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1326 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |

## Knowledge

- Hy4 preview: —
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1328 |

## Multilingual

- Hy4 preview: —
- Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1323 |

## Instruction Following

- Hy4 preview: —
- Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1303 |

## Long Context

- Hy4 preview: —
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1324 |

## Writing & Preference

- Hy4 preview: —
- Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1336 |

## FAQ

### Is Hy4 preview better than Qwen Plus?

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Plus costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Hy4 preview or Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview lists at $0.83 and $2.50.

### Is Hy4 preview or Qwen Plus better for coding?

Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.6 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Hy4 preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

### How many benchmarks do Hy4 preview and Qwen Plus share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy4 preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.