# Hy4 preview vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

> Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.6 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hy4-preview-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 54.5 to 33.6.

## Snapshot

| | Hy4 preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 44.6 | 37.3 |
| Rank | 73 | 191 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.83 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Hy4 preview: 51.4 (#36)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.1 (#186)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1633 | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1292 |

## Reasoning

- Hy4 preview: 30.6 (#75)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 24.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 68.2% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1272 |

## Math

- Hy4 preview: 54.5 (#37)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 33.6 (#170)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 75% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |

## Knowledge

- Hy4 preview: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.0 (#178)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1294 |

## Multilingual

- Hy4 preview: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.3 (#226)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1210 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1241 |
| LMArena French | — | 1262 |
| LMArena German | — | 1260 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1288 |

## Instruction Following

- Hy4 preview: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.8 (#213)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1246 |

## Long Context

- Hy4 preview: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#190)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1272 |

## Writing & Preference

- Hy4 preview: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.4 (#215)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1271 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1252 |

## FAQ

### Is Hy4 preview better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.6 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Hy4 preview or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.4 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hy4 preview and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy4 preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.
