# Hy4 preview vs Llama 3-70B

> Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hy4-preview-vs-llama-3-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 55.7 to 12.8.

## Snapshot

| | Hy4 preview | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 45.3 | 28.8 |
| Rank | 73 | 323 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.83 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Hy4 preview: 51.6 (#38)
- Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1632 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 43.6% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1206 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.5% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 72% |
| MBPP+ | — | 69% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Hy4 preview: —
- Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 5% |

## Reasoning

- Hy4 preview: 31.9 (#79)
- Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 35.1% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 68.2% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1195 |
| DTBench | — | 54.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 122.93 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.1 |
| WinoGrande | — | 83.5% |

## Math

- Hy4 preview: 55.7 (#42)
- Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.3% |
| ProofBench | 75% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1218 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 22.6% |

## Knowledge

- Hy4 preview: —
- Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 40.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1149 |
| MMLU | — | 79.3% |

## Multilingual

- Hy4 preview: —
- Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1114 |
| LMArena French | — | 1232 |
| LMArena German | — | 1169 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1017 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1017 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1159 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1241 |

## Instruction Following

- Hy4 preview: —
- Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1194 |

## Long Context

- Hy4 preview: —
- Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1174 |

## Writing & Preference

- Hy4 preview: —
- Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1221 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1210 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1223 |

## FAQ

### Is Hy4 preview better than Llama 3-70B?

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Hy4 preview or Llama 3-70B better for coding?

Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.6 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hy4 preview and Llama 3-70B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy4 preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.
