# Hy4 preview vs Llama 3.2 90B

> Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.6 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hy4-preview-vs-llama-3-2-90b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 54.5 to 10.4.

## Snapshot

| | Hy4 preview | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 44.6 | 27.1 |
| Rank | 73 | 326 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.83 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Hy4 preview: 51.4 (#36)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1633 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Hy4 preview: —
- Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |

## Reasoning

- Hy4 preview: 30.6 (#75)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 68.2% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.5 |

## Math

- Hy4 preview: 54.5 (#37)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.6% |
| ProofBench | 75% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.4% |

## Knowledge

- Hy4 preview: —
- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41% |
| MMLU | — | 80.3% |

## Multimodal

- Hy4 preview: —
- Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |

## FAQ

### Is Hy4 preview better than Llama 3.2 90B?

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.6 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Hy4 preview and Llama 3.2 90B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy4 preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.