# Hy4 preview vs Llama 3.2 3B

> Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.6 to 28.4 on the Noometry Index. Llama 3.2 3B costs 10× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hy4-preview-vs-llama-3-2-3b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 54.5 to 29.9.
- Llama 3.2 3B is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.33 per million input/output tokens, against $0.83 / $2.50 for Hy4 preview.
- Hy4 preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Hy4 preview | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 44.6 | 28.4 |
| Rank | 73 | 318 |
| Context | 1.05M | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.83 | $0.05 |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | $0.33 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Hy4 preview: 51.4 (#36)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 27.1 (#314)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1633 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 23.4% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1098 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 28.3% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Hy4 preview: —
- Llama 3.2 3B: 19.9 (#135)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 21.9% |
| BALROG | — | 10.1% |

## Reasoning

- Hy4 preview: 30.6 (#75)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 20.1 (#225)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 68.2% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1095 |

## Math

- Hy4 preview: 54.5 (#37)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 29.9 (#213)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 75% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1126 |

## Knowledge

- Hy4 preview: —
- Llama 3.2 3B: 29.1 (#232)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1090 |

## Multilingual

- Hy4 preview: —
- Llama 3.2 3B: 26.4 (#276)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1019 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1017 |
| LMArena German | — | 1056 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 949 |

## Instruction Following

- Hy4 preview: —
- Llama 3.2 3B: 56.3 (#270)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1089 |

## Long Context

- Hy4 preview: —
- Llama 3.2 3B: 33.4 (#256)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1101 |

## Writing & Preference

- Hy4 preview: —
- Llama 3.2 3B: 24.9 (#302)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1110 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1094 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 595 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1105 |

## FAQ

### Is Hy4 preview better than Llama 3.2 3B?

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.6 to 28.4 on the Noometry Index. Llama 3.2 3B costs 10× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Hy4 preview or Llama 3.2 3B?

Llama 3.2 3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.33 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview lists at $0.83 and $2.50.

### Is Hy4 preview or Llama 3.2 3B better for coding?

Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.4 versus 27.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Hy4 preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Hy4 preview and Llama 3.2 3B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy4 preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 3B has 18.