# Hy4 preview vs Llama 2-7B

> Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hy4-preview-vs-llama-2-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 55.7 to 30.7.

## Snapshot

| | Hy4 preview | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 45.3 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 73 | 317 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.75 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.25 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Hy4 preview: 51.6 (#38)
- Llama 2-7B: 29.2 (#307)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1632 | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1002 |

## Reasoning

- Hy4 preview: 31.9 (#79)
- Llama 2-7B: 15.7 (#312)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 68.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1009 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 39.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 99.06 |
| HellaSwag | — | 77.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 73.3% |
| PIQA | — | 78.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 69.2% |

## Math

- Hy4 preview: 55.7 (#42)
- Llama 2-7B: 30.7 (#233)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 75% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1042 |
| GSM8K | — | 16.7% |

## Knowledge

- Hy4 preview: —
- Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#248)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1036 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 45.9% |
| BoolQ | — | 77.9% |
| MMLU | — | 45.8% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 58.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.7% |

## Multimodal

- Hy4 preview: —
- Llama 2-7B: —

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.1% |

## Multilingual

- Hy4 preview: —
- Llama 2-7B: 23.8 (#293)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 973 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 973 |
| LMArena French | — | 970 |
| LMArena German | — | 978 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 995 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1007 |

## Instruction Following

- Hy4 preview: —
- Llama 2-7B: 50.8 (#298)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1006 |

## Long Context

- Hy4 preview: —
- Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#287)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 999 |

## Writing & Preference

- Hy4 preview: —
- Llama 2-7B: 28.0 (#298)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1053 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1033 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1029 |

## FAQ

### Is Hy4 preview better than Llama 2-7B?

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Hy4 preview or Llama 2-7B better for coding?

Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.6 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hy4 preview and Llama 2-7B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy4 preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-7B has 29.