# Hy3 vs QwQ-32B

> Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hy3-vs-qwq-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 7 categories and QwQ-32B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hy3 leads 62.2 to 50.6.

## Snapshot

| | Hy3 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 44.2 | 39.8 |
| Rank | 79 | 159 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.13 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.53 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Hy3: 46.8 (#63)
- QwQ-32B: 35.4 (#226)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1464 | 1333 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 20.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1508 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 44.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 72.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.4% |

## Reasoning

- Hy3: 26.1 (#136)
- QwQ-32B: 23.7 (#174)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1447 | 1325 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 41.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 83.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 137.6 |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.3 |
| LiveBench | — | 72% |

## Math

- Hy3: 40.1 (#93)
- QwQ-32B: 38.0 (#143)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1475 | 1359 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 59.2% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.8% |

## Knowledge

- Hy3: 40.8 (#114)
- QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#158)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | 1324 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |

## Multilingual

- Hy3: 53.5 (#65)
- QwQ-32B: 44.8 (#176)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1426 | 1305 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1493 | 1378 |
| LMArena French | 1461 | 1336 |
| LMArena German | 1439 | 1313 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1392 | 1262 |
| LMArena Korean | 1395 | 1279 |
| LMArena Russian | 1432 | 1297 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | 1354 |

## Instruction Following

- Hy3: 75.1 (#70)
- QwQ-32B: 72.6 (#137)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1426 | 1297 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.8% |

## Long Context

- Hy3: 44.1 (#75)
- QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | 1308 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- Hy3: 62.2 (#81)
- QwQ-32B: 50.6 (#180)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1439 | 1329 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | 1288 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 80.2% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1257 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.4% |

## FAQ

### Is Hy3 better than QwQ-32B?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Hy3 or QwQ-32B better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 35.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hy3 and QwQ-32B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 19 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.