# Hy3 vs Qwen3.7 Flash

> Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 39.5 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 4.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hy3-vs-qwen3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Flash in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 40.2.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.13 / $0.53 for Hy3.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- Hy3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Hy3 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 39.5 |
| Rank | 79 | 152 |
| Context | 262K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.13 | $0.03 |
| Output $/M | $0.53 | $0.13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Hy3: 46.6 (#60)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1509 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1465 | — |

## Reasoning

- Hy3: 25.0 (#134)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 41.2% | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1449 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.62 |

## Math

- Hy3: 37.4 (#98)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1475 | — |

## Knowledge

- Hy3: 40.2 (#108)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1461 | — |

## Multilingual

- Hy3: 53.7 (#60)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1496 | — |
| LMArena French | 1461 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1390 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1435 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1448 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Hy3: 75.3 (#68)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1425 | — |

## Long Context

- Hy3: 44.1 (#70)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1443 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Hy3: 62.5 (#75)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1442 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1399 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Hy3 better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 39.5 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 4.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Hy3 or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Hy3 lists at $0.13 and $0.53.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Hy3 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.