# Hy3 vs Qwen3.6 35B-A3B

> Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hy3-vs-qwen3-6-35b-a3b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 35B-A3B leads 51.3 to 40.8.
- Hy3 is cheaper at $0.13 / $0.53 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $1.49 for Qwen3.6 35B-A3B.

## Snapshot

| | Hy3 | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 44.2 | 37.6 |
| Rank | 79 | 201 |
| Context | 262K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.13 | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | $0.53 | $1.49 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Hy3: 46.8 (#63)
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 37.2 (#196)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1508 | — |
| SciCode | — | 35.8% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1464 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Hy3: —
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 22.1 (#134)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 23% |

## Reasoning

- Hy3: 26.1 (#136)
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 28.0 (#109)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 41.2% | 41.6% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 26% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1447 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 22% |
| DTBench | — | 73.9% |
| LMCA | — | 29.7% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 44.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.93 |

## Math

- Hy3: 40.1 (#93)
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 38.9 (#121)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 20.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1475 | — |

## Knowledge

- Hy3: 40.8 (#114)
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 51.3 (#68)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | — |

## Multilingual

- Hy3: 53.5 (#65)
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1426 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1493 | — |
| LMArena French | 1461 | — |
| LMArena German | 1439 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1432 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Hy3: 75.1 (#70)
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1426 | — |

## Long Context

- Hy3: 44.1 (#75)
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Hy3: 62.2 (#81)
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1439 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Hy3 better than Qwen3.6 35B-A3B?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Hy3 or Qwen3.6 35B-A3B?

Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.13 per million input tokens and $0.53 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 35B-A3B lists at $0.25 and $1.49.

### Is Hy3 or Qwen3.6 35B-A3B better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 37.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Hy3 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B has 14.