# Hy3 vs Qwen3.6 27B

> Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 41.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hy3-vs-qwen3-6-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 27B leads 52.4 to 40.2.
- Hy3 is cheaper at $0.13 / $0.53 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $3.60 for Qwen3.6 27B.

## Snapshot

| | Hy3 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 41.9 |
| Rank | 79 | 112 |
| Context | 262K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.13 | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | $0.53 | $3.60 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Hy3: 46.6 (#60)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 38.5 (#162)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1509 | — |
| SciCode | — | 37.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1465 | — |

## Reasoning

- Hy3: 25.0 (#134)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 24.4 (#148)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 41.2% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1449 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 7% |
| DTBench | — | 78.1% |
| LMCA | — | 34.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.47 |

## Math

- Hy3: 37.4 (#98)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 47.5 (#56)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 35.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 91.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1475 | — |

## Knowledge

- Hy3: 40.2 (#108)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 52.4 (#58)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 85.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1461 | — |

## Multilingual

- Hy3: 53.7 (#60)
- Qwen3.6 27B: —

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1496 | — |
| LMArena French | 1461 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1390 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1435 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1448 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Hy3: 75.3 (#68)
- Qwen3.6 27B: —

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1425 | — |

## Long Context

- Hy3: 44.1 (#70)
- Qwen3.6 27B: —

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1443 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Hy3: 62.5 (#75)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 50.3 (#180)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1442 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1399 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1026 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Hy3 better than Qwen3.6 27B?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 41.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Hy3 or Qwen3.6 27B?

Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.13 per million input tokens and $0.53 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 27B lists at $0.60 and $3.60.

### Is Hy3 or Qwen3.6 27B better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.6 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Qwen3.6 27B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 27B has 11.