# Hy3 vs Qwen3.5 397B-A17B

> Qwen3.5 397B-A17B is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.0 to 44.2 on the Noometry Index. Hy3 costs 9.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.5 397B-A17B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hy3-vs-qwen3-5-397b-a17b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B in 6 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads 53.3 to 40.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 41.2% for Hy3 and 58.9% for Qwen3.5 397B-A17B.
- Hy3 is cheaper at $0.0825 / $0.33 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $3.60 for Qwen3.5 397B-A17B.

## Snapshot

| | Hy3 | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 44.2 | 46.0 |
| Rank | 79 | 67 |
| Context | 262K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.0825 | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | $0.33 | $3.60 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Hy3: 46.8 (#63)
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 42.0 (#114)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1508 | 1400 |
| LMArena Coding | 1464 | 1465 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Hy3: —
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 33.3 (#53)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 24.9% |
| τ²-bench Airline | — | 81.5% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 9.8% |
| τ²-bench Retail | — | 84.4% |
| τ²-bench Telecom | — | 97.8% |

## Reasoning

- Hy3: 26.1 (#136)
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 34.5 (#70)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 41.2% | 58.9% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1447 | 1448 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 73.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 13% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 65.1% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 87.5% |
| LMCA | — | 37.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.65 |

## Math

- Hy3: 40.1 (#93)
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 46.1 (#73)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1475 | 1454 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 31.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 88.9% |

## Knowledge

- Hy3: 40.8 (#114)
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 53.3 (#58)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | 1462 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 86.4% |

## Multimodal

- Hy3: —
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 40.7 (#44)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1263 |

## Multilingual

- Hy3: 53.5 (#65)
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 53.7 (#59)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1426 | 1430 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1493 | 1500 |
| LMArena French | 1461 | 1461 |
| LMArena German | 1439 | 1447 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1392 | 1426 |
| LMArena Korean | 1395 | 1384 |
| LMArena Russian | 1432 | 1429 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | 1441 |

## Instruction Following

- Hy3: 75.1 (#70)
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 75.0 (#77)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1426 | 1424 |

## Long Context

- Hy3: 44.1 (#75)
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 44.1 (#74)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | 1442 |

## Writing & Preference

- Hy3: 62.2 (#81)
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 62.3 (#79)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1439 | 1438 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | 1401 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | 1446 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1478 |

## FAQ

### Is Hy3 better than Qwen3.5 397B-A17B?

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.0 to 44.2 on the Noometry Index. Hy3 costs 9.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.5 397B-A17B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Hy3 or Qwen3.5 397B-A17B?

Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0825 per million input tokens and $0.33 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 397B-A17B lists at $0.60 and $3.60.

### Is Hy3 or Qwen3.5 397B-A17B better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 42.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B has 36.