# Hy3 vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10B

> Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hy3-vs-qwen3-5-122b-a10b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hy3 leads 46.8 to 39.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 41.2% for Hy3 and 51.7% for Qwen3.5 122B-A10B.
- Hy3 is cheaper at $0.0825 / $0.33 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $3.20 for Qwen3.5 122B-A10B.

## Snapshot

| | Hy3 | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 44.2 | 42.1 |
| Rank | 79 | 119 |
| Context | 262K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.0825 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $0.33 | $3.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Hy3: 46.8 (#63)
- Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.1 (#162)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1508 | 1360 |
| LMArena Coding | 1464 | 1436 |
| SciCode | — | 35.6% |

## Reasoning

- Hy3: 26.1 (#136)
- Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 27.2 (#123)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 41.2% | 51.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1447 | 1421 |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 51.2% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84.3% |
| LMCA | — | 32.2% |

## Math

- Hy3: 40.1 (#93)
- Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.1 (#112)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1475 | 1432 |

## Knowledge

- Hy3: 40.8 (#114)
- Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 38.8 (#142)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | 1432 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 11.2% |

## Multimodal

- Hy3: —
- Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.6 (#57)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1245 |

## Multilingual

- Hy3: 53.5 (#65)
- Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 51.6 (#107)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1426 | 1400 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1493 | 1462 |
| LMArena French | 1461 | 1442 |
| LMArena German | 1439 | 1426 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1392 | 1367 |
| LMArena Korean | 1395 | 1352 |
| LMArena Russian | 1432 | 1400 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | 1424 |

## Instruction Following

- Hy3: 75.1 (#70)
- Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 73.8 (#115)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1426 | 1399 |

## Long Context

- Hy3: 44.1 (#75)
- Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 43.0 (#109)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | 1410 |

## Writing & Preference

- Hy3: 62.2 (#81)
- Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 60.0 (#105)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1439 | 1417 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | 1368 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | 1416 |

## FAQ

### Is Hy3 better than Qwen3.5 122B-A10B?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Hy3 or Qwen3.5 122B-A10B?

Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0825 per million input tokens and $0.33 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 122B-A10B lists at $0.40 and $3.20.

### Is Hy3 or Qwen3.5 122B-A10B better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 39.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has 27.