# Hy3 vs Qwen3 32B

> Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hy3-vs-qwen3-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen3 32B in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hy3 leads 62.5 to 53.1.
- Hy3 is cheaper at $0.13 / $0.53 per million input/output tokens, against $0.70 / $2.80 for Qwen3 32B.
- Hy3 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Hy3 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 79 | 166 |
| Context | 262K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.13 | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | $0.53 | $2.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Hy3: 46.6 (#60)
- Qwen3 32B: 37.3 (#184)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1465 | 1358 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 40% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1509 | — |
| SciCode | — | 35.4% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Hy3: —
- Qwen3 32B: 32.3 (#58)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 48.7% |

## Reasoning

- Hy3: 25.0 (#134)
- Qwen3 32B: 19.6 (#233)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1449 | 1335 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 54.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 41.2% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| DTBench | — | 67.5% |
| LMCA | — | 17.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.51 |

## Math

- Hy3: 37.4 (#98)
- Qwen3 32B: 37.9 (#89)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1475 | 1399 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.9% |

## Knowledge

- Hy3: 40.2 (#108)
- Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#112)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1461 | 1362 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.9% |

## Multilingual

- Hy3: 53.7 (#60)
- Qwen3 32B: 45.8 (#162)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1427 | 1317 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1496 | 1357 |
| LMArena Russian | 1435 | 1311 |
| LMArena French | 1461 | — |
| LMArena German | — | 1341 |
| LMArena Korean | 1390 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1448 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Hy3: 75.3 (#68)
- Qwen3 32B: 69.1 (#174)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1425 | 1305 |

## Long Context

- Hy3: 44.1 (#70)
- Qwen3 32B: 43.7 (#83)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1443 | 1327 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 74.2% |

## Writing & Preference

- Hy3: 62.5 (#75)
- Qwen3 32B: 53.1 (#158)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1442 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1399 | 1297 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | 1331 |

## FAQ

### Is Hy3 better than Qwen3 32B?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Hy3 or Qwen3 32B?

Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.13 per million input tokens and $0.53 per million output tokens; Qwen3 32B lists at $0.70 and $2.80.

### Is Hy3 or Qwen3 32B better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.6 versus 37.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Hy3 does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Qwen3 32B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.