# Hy3 vs Qwen1.5-32B

> Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hy3-vs-qwen1-5-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-32B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hy3 leads 62.2 to 34.2.

## Snapshot

| | Hy3 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 44.2 | 30.5 |
| Rank | 79 | 293 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.0825 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.33 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Hy3: 46.8 (#63)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.7 (#282)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1464 | 1155 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1508 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.3% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 42% |

## Reasoning

- Hy3: 26.1 (#136)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 21.8 (#212)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1447 | 1130 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 41.2% | — |

## Math

- Hy3: 40.1 (#93)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 33.0 (#207)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1475 | 1155 |

## Knowledge

- Hy3: 40.8 (#114)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#296)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | 1126 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 30.7% |
| MMLU | — | 74.4% |

## Multilingual

- Hy3: 53.5 (#65)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.4 (#259)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1426 | 1106 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1493 | 1177 |
| LMArena French | 1461 | 1101 |
| LMArena German | 1439 | 1058 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1392 | 1027 |
| LMArena Korean | 1395 | 1008 |
| LMArena Russian | 1432 | 1073 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | 1089 |

## Instruction Following

- Hy3: 75.1 (#70)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 57.7 (#265)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1426 | 1116 |

## Long Context

- Hy3: 44.1 (#75)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#246)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | 1146 |

## Writing & Preference

- Hy3: 62.2 (#81)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.2 (#271)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1439 | 1137 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | 1140 |

## FAQ

### Is Hy3 better than Qwen1.5-32B?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Hy3 or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Qwen1.5-32B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.