# Hy3 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

> Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hy3-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hy3 leads 62.2 to 46.2.

## Snapshot

| | Hy3 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 44.2 | 37.9 |
| Rank | 79 | 191 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.0825 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.33 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Hy3: 46.8 (#63)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1464 | 1291 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1508 | — |

## Reasoning

- Hy3: 26.1 (#136)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1447 | 1272 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 41.2% | — |

## Math

- Hy3: 40.1 (#93)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1475 | 1305 |

## Knowledge

- Hy3: 40.8 (#114)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | 1295 |

## Multilingual

- Hy3: 53.5 (#65)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1426 | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1493 | 1242 |
| LMArena French | 1461 | 1260 |
| LMArena German | 1439 | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | 1432 | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | 1289 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1395 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Hy3: 75.1 (#70)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1426 | 1247 |

## Long Context

- Hy3: 44.1 (#75)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | 1272 |

## Writing & Preference

- Hy3: 62.2 (#81)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1439 | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | 1252 |

## FAQ

### Is Hy3 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Hy3 or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.