# Hy3 vs Mistral Nemo

> Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 1.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hy3-vs-mistral-nemo
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hy3 leads 62.5 to 28.6.
- Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.13 / $0.53 for Hy3.
- Hy3 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Hy3 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 25.9 |
| Rank | 79 | 332 |
| Context | 262K | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.13 | $0.15 |
| Output $/M | $0.53 | $0.15 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Hy3: 46.6 (#60)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1509 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1465 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Hy3: —
- Mistral Nemo: 23.3 (#118)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.6% |
| BALROG | — | 17.6% |

## Reasoning

- Hy3: 25.0 (#134)
- Mistral Nemo: 19.9 (#230)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 41.2% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1449 | — |
| DTBench | — | 48.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.63 |
| PIQA | — | 83.5% |

## Math

- Hy3: 37.4 (#98)
- Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#263)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1475 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10.8% |
| GSM8K | — | 84.2% |

## Knowledge

- Hy3: 40.2 (#108)
- Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#293)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 29.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1461 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 82.5% |

## Multilingual

- Hy3: 53.7 (#60)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1496 | — |
| LMArena French | 1461 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1390 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1435 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1448 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Hy3: 75.3 (#68)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1425 | — |

## Long Context

- Hy3: 44.1 (#70)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1443 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Hy3: 62.5 (#75)
- Mistral Nemo: 28.6 (#291)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1442 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1399 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 881 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Hy3 better than Mistral Nemo?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 1.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Hy3 or Mistral Nemo?

Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Hy3 lists at $0.13 and $0.53.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Hy3 does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Mistral Nemo share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.