# Hy3 vs MiMo-V2-Flash

> Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hy3-vs-mimo-v2-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 8 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hy3 leads 46.6 to 35.8.
- MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.13 / $0.53 for Hy3.

## Snapshot

| | Hy3 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 40.8 |
| Rank | 79 | 137 |
| Context | 262K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.13 | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | $0.53 | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Hy3: 46.6 (#60)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.8 (#205)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1509 | 1330 |
| LMArena Coding | 1465 | 1443 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |

## Reasoning

- Hy3: 25.0 (#134)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.1 (#155)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1449 | 1420 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 41.2% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |

## Math

- Hy3: 37.4 (#98)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.6 (#141)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1475 | 1396 |

## Knowledge

- Hy3: 40.2 (#108)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.1 (#126)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1461 | 1425 |

## Multilingual

- Hy3: 53.7 (#60)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.1 (#109)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1427 | 1391 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1496 | 1463 |
| LMArena French | 1461 | 1429 |
| LMArena Korean | 1390 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1435 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1448 | 1420 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1324 |

## Instruction Following

- Hy3: 75.3 (#68)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.7 (#115)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1425 | 1392 |

## Long Context

- Hy3: 44.1 (#70)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#106)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1443 | 1409 |

## Writing & Preference

- Hy3: 62.5 (#75)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.9 (#101)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1442 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1399 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | 1404 |

## FAQ

### Is Hy3 better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Hy3 or MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Hy3 lists at $0.13 and $0.53.

### Is Hy3 or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.6 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Hy3 and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 17 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.