# Hy3 vs Llama 13b

> Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hy3-vs-llama-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 13b in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hy3 leads 62.2 to 13.8.

## Snapshot

| | Hy3 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 44.2 | 24.4 |
| Rank | 79 | 348 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.13 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.53 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Hy3: 46.8 (#63)
- Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1464 | 683 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1508 | — |

## Reasoning

- Hy3: 26.1 (#136)
- Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1447 | 728 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 41.2% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 100.58 |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |

## Math

- Hy3: 40.1 (#93)
- Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1475 | 838 |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |

## Knowledge

- Hy3: 40.8 (#114)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| MMLU | — | 47.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |

## Multimodal

- Hy3: —
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |

## Multilingual

- Hy3: 53.5 (#65)
- Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1426 | 819 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1493 | — |
| LMArena French | 1461 | — |
| LMArena German | 1439 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1432 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Hy3: 75.1 (#70)
- Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1426 | 781 |

## Long Context

- Hy3: 44.1 (#75)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Hy3: 62.2 (#81)
- Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)

| Benchmark | Hy3 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1439 | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | 753 |

## FAQ

### Is Hy3 better than Llama 13b?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Hy3 or Llama 13b better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Llama 13b share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.