# Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs Trinity Large Thinking

> Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hunyuan-vision-1-5-vs-trinity-large-thinking
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 6 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 27.8 to 16.3.
- Trinity Large Thinking has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 42.6 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 95 | 180 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.2 (#119)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 33.8 (#238)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1419 | 1381 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |

## Reasoning

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 27.8 (#96)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 16.3 (#298)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1417 | 1350 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |

## Math

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 34.9 (#149)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1366 |

## Knowledge

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 40.3 (#107)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1359 |

## Multimodal

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.1 (#78)
- Trinity Large Thinking: —

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |

## Multilingual

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.5 (#118)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 46.4 (#155)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1383 | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1372 |
| LMArena French | — | 1374 |
| LMArena German | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1312 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1338 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1356 |

## Instruction Following

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.9 (#110)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 70.7 (#157)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1398 | 1334 |

## Long Context

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#110)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 41.2 (#139)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1405 | 1355 |

## Writing & Preference

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.4 (#95)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 54.0 (#152)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1407 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1389 | 1321 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1423 | 1342 |

## FAQ

### Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.2 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Trinity Large Thinking share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.