# Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs Phi-4

> Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hunyuan-vision-1-5-vs-phi-4
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 6 categories and Phi-4 in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 60.1 to 40.5.
- Phi-4 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 31.2 |
| Rank | 98 | 279 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.07 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)
- Phi-4: 34.4 (#239)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1418 | 1231 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.5% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 30.7% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 55.4% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
- Phi-4: 22.8 (#128)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.8% |
| BALROG | — | 11.6% |

## Reasoning

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)
- Phi-4: 17.7 (#291)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1416 | 1220 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 47.8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 45.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 130.42 |
| LiveBench | — | 41.6% |

## Math

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
- Phi-4: 20.8 (#285)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 13.8% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 42% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1246 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 64.9% |

## Knowledge

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
- Phi-4: 32.6 (#209)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 29.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 3.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1203 |
| MMLU | — | 84.8% |

## Multimodal

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)
- Phi-4: —

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |

## Multilingual

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)
- Phi-4: 37.2 (#237)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | 1197 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1212 |
| LMArena French | — | 1224 |
| LMArena German | — | 1222 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1158 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1151 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1209 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1234 |

## Instruction Following

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)
- Phi-4: 60.4 (#251)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1397 | 1201 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.4% |

## Long Context

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)
- Phi-4: 36.9 (#226)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1404 | 1217 |

## Writing & Preference

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)
- Phi-4: 40.5 (#244)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1405 | 1217 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | 1182 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1422 | 1206 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 62.6% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 25.6% |

## FAQ

### Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than Phi-4?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or Phi-4 better for coding?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Phi-4 share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 has 37.