# Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs MiMo-V2-Pro

> Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and MiMo-V2-Pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.1 vs 43.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hunyuan-vision-1-5-vs-mimo-v2-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 2 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 28.9 to 22.1.

## Snapshot

| | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 43.0 |
| Rank | 98 | 103 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1418 | 1476 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1433 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |

## Reasoning

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1416 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |

## Math

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1447 |

## Knowledge

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1478 |

## Multimodal

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: —

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |

## Multilingual

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1456 |
| LMArena French | — | 1469 |
| LMArena German | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1400 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1457 |

## Instruction Following

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1397 | 1445 |

## Long Context

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1404 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |

## Writing & Preference

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1405 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1422 | 1456 |

## FAQ

### Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than MiMo-V2-Pro?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and MiMo-V2-Pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.1 vs 43.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and MiMo-V2-Pro share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.