# Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs MiMo-V2-Flash

> Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hunyuan-vision-1-5-vs-mimo-v2-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 4 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 41.8 to 36.1.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 98 | 138 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1418 | 1443 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |

## Reasoning

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1416 | 1420 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |

## Math

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1396 |

## Knowledge

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1425 |

## Multimodal

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: —

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |

## Multilingual

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1462 |
| LMArena French | — | 1429 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1420 |

## Instruction Following

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1397 | 1392 |

## Long Context

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1404 | 1409 |

## Writing & Preference

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1405 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1422 | 1404 |

## FAQ

### Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.