# Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs Kimi K2.7 Code

> Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Kimi K2.7 Code score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.1 vs 43.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hunyuan-vision-1-5-vs-kimi-k2-7-code
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 39.0 to 28.9.
- Kimi K2.7 Code has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 43.3 |
| Rank | 98 | 94 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.95 |
| Output $/M | — | $4 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 30.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 30.1% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1473 |
| SciCode | — | 47.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 54.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1418 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 886.23 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 37.6% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,083 |

## Reasoning

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 57.9% |
| CritPt | — | 10% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1416 | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 48.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 149.97 |

## Math

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 54% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 12.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |

## Knowledge

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 36.5% |

## Multimodal

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |

## Multilingual

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1397 | — |

## Long Context

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1404 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1405 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1422 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Kimi K2.7 Code score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.1 vs 43.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Kimi K2.7 Code share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.