# Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Trinity Large Thinking

> Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hunyuan-turbos-vs-trinity-large-thinking
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 6 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 2 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 27.8 to 16.9.
- Trinity Large Thinking has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 38.6 |
| Rank | 139 | 185 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1381 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |

## Reasoning

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 1350 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |

## Math

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | 1366 |

## Knowledge

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1360 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |

## Multilingual

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1363 | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | 1373 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | 1374 |
| LMArena German | 1355 | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1342 | 1311 |
| LMArena Korean | 1351 | 1306 |
| LMArena Russian | 1368 | 1337 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1357 |

## Instruction Following

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1344 | 1334 |

## Long Context

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1366 | 1355 |

## Writing & Preference

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1359 | 1320 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1387 | 1342 |

## FAQ

### Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Trinity Large Thinking share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.