# Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs o3

> o3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.4 to 40.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hunyuan-turbos-vs-o3
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 0 categories and o3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where o3 leads 54.5 to 36.4.

## Snapshot

| | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 40.6 | 47.4 |
| Rank | 138 | 53 |
| Context | — | 200K |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $8 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 39.3 (#148)
- o3: 47.3 (#57)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1408 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 62.3% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 58.4% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 81.3% |
| GSO | — | 8.8% |
| WeirdML | — | 52.4% |
| CadEval | — | 74% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 933.55 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —
- o3: 34.3 (#42)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 63% |
| GDPval | — | 30.8% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 45.2% |
| OSWorld | — | 23% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1144 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 65.4% |

## Reasoning

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 26.7 (#115)
- o3: 32.1 (#66)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 1402 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 6.5% |
| SimpleBench | — | 53.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 67.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 60.8% |
| CritPt | — | 1.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 38% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 13.1% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 29% |
| DTBench | — | 84.8% |
| LMCA | — | 39.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.88 |
| ForecastBench | — | 62.5 |

## Math

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 34.8 (#155)
- o3: 48.9 (#49)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | 1426 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 33.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 71.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 97.8% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 18.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |

## Knowledge

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 36.4 (#158)
- o3: 54.5 (#47)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1338 | 1403 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 81.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 20.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 49.4% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 85.9% |
| Confabulations | — | 14.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 75.3% |

## Multimodal

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —
- o3: 40.7 (#35)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1214 |
| GeoBench | — | 74% |
| VPCT | — | 52% |

## Multilingual

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 49.1 (#132)
- o3: 51.9 (#99)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1362 | 1402 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1416 | 1438 |
| LMArena French | 1390 | 1430 |
| LMArena German | 1356 | 1420 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1338 | 1404 |
| LMArena Korean | 1351 | 1371 |
| LMArena Russian | 1368 | 1407 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1395 |

## Instruction Following

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.2 (#153)
- o3: 73.0 (#122)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1344 | 1368 |
| IFEval | — | 86.9% |

## Long Context

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#132)
- o3: 53.2 (#6)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1365 | 1372 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 88.9% |
| CL-bench | — | 17.8% |

## Writing & Preference

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.5 (#125)
- o3: 63.7 (#62)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1410 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1358 | 1359 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1387 | 1405 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 83.9% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1676 |
| WildBench | — | 86.1% |

## FAQ

### Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than o3?

o3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.4 to 40.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or o3 better for coding?

o3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.3 versus 39.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and o3 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and o3 has 63.