# Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs o3-pro

> o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hunyuan-turbos-vs-o3-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in long context, where o3-pro leads 72.2 to 41.6.

## Snapshot

| | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 42.9 |
| Rank | 139 | 105 |
| Context | — | 200K |
| Input $/M | — | $20 |
| Output $/M | — | $80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)
- o3-pro: 55.5 (#24)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 84.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 58.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | — |

## Reasoning

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)
- o3-pro: 23.8 (#171)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.9% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 59.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | — |
| DTBench | — | 86.9% |
| LMCA | — | 38.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.42 |

## Math

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)
- o3-pro: —

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | — |

## Knowledge

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)
- o3-pro: 29.5 (#238)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Confabulations | — | 14.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | — |

## Multilingual

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)
- o3-pro: —

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1363 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | — |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1342 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1368 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)
- o3-pro: —

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1344 | — |

## Long Context

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)
- o3-pro: 72.2 (#1)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 97.2% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1366 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)
- o3-pro: 57.1 (#133)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1359 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 84.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1387 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than o3-pro?

o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or o3-pro better for coding?

o3-pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and o3-pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and o3-pro has 12.