# Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs o1

> Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and o1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.6 vs 40.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hunyuan-turbos-vs-o1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 2 categories and o1 in 6 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where o1 leads 50.3 to 41.6.

## Snapshot

| | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 40.6 | 40.6 |
| Rank | 138 | 140 |
| Context | — | 200K |
| Input $/M | — | $15 |
| Output $/M | — | $60 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 39.3 (#148)
- o1: 45.7 (#64)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1367 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 61.7% |
| WeirdML | — | 47.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 69.7% |
| CadEval | — | 56% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 89% |
| MBPP+ | — | 80.2% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —
- o1: 24.3 (#111)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 10% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 51.1% |

## Reasoning

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 26.7 (#115)
- o1: 27.5 (#103)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 1372 |
| SimpleBench | — | 41.7% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 30.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 15% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 5.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 91.6% |
| DTBench | — | 74.7% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65.5% |
| LMCA | — | 22.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 141.92 |
| LiveBench | — | 75.7% |

## Math

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 34.8 (#155)
- o1: 34.9 (#150)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | 1388 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 14.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 80.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 94.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 9.3% |

## Knowledge

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 36.4 (#158)
- o1: 41.5 (#101)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1338 | 1362 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 76.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 41.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 11.7% |

## Multimodal

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —
- o1: 33.6 (#87)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1168 |
| GeoBench | — | 80% |
| VPCT | — | 37% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 41.4% |

## Multilingual

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 49.1 (#132)
- o1: 48.8 (#137)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1362 | 1359 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1416 | 1394 |
| LMArena French | 1390 | 1343 |
| LMArena German | 1356 | 1337 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1338 | 1346 |
| LMArena Korean | 1351 | 1396 |
| LMArena Russian | 1368 | 1356 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1345 |

## Instruction Following

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.2 (#153)
- o1: 75.0 (#82)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1344 | 1368 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.5% |

## Long Context

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#132)
- o1: 50.3 (#9)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1365 | 1378 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.5 (#125)
- o1: 55.8 (#139)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1366 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1358 | 1347 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1387 | 1368 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 70.2% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 65.4% |

## FAQ

### Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than o1?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and o1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.6 vs 40.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or o1 better for coding?

o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.7 versus 39.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and o1 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and o1 has 52.