# Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hunyuan-turbos-vs-mimo-v2-6-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 54.5 to 37.5.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 50.3 |
| Rank | 139 | 49 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1534 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1629 |
| SciCode | — | 60.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,158 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 59.5% |

## Reasoning

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 1512 |
| CritPt | — | 26.6% |

## Math

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | 1494 |
| ProofBench | — | 70% |

## Knowledge

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1543 |

## Multimodal

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |

## Multilingual

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1363 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | 1529 |
| LMArena Russian | 1368 | 1480 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1342 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1351 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1344 | 1493 |

## Long Context

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1366 | 1501 |

## Writing & Preference

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1492 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1359 | 1468 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1387 | 1464 |

## FAQ

### Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.