# Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Mercury 2

> Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hunyuan-turbos-vs-mercury-2
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 7 categories and Mercury 2 in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 40.0 to 33.5.

## Snapshot

| | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Inception |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 39.1 |
| Rank | 139 | 175 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.75 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)
- Mercury 2: 33.5 (#255)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1391 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1171 |
| SciCode | — | 38.7% |
| WeirdML | — | 43.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.58 |

## Reasoning

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)
- Mercury 2: 23.8 (#170)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 1362 |
| CritPt | — | 0.8% |

## Math

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)
- Mercury 2: —

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | — |

## Knowledge

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)
- Mercury 2: 36.2 (#172)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1358 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.3% |

## Multilingual

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)
- Mercury 2: 46.6 (#157)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1363 | 1331 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | 1417 |
| LMArena Russian | 1368 | 1304 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1342 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1351 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)
- Mercury 2: 70.2 (#165)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1344 | 1329 |

## Long Context

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)
- Mercury 2: 40.5 (#154)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1366 | 1330 |

## Writing & Preference

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)
- Mercury 2: 53.8 (#155)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1355 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1359 | 1289 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1387 | 1358 |

## FAQ

### Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Mercury 2?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Mercury 2 better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 33.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Mercury 2 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2 has 17.