# Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Llama 13b

> Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hunyuan-turbos-vs-llama-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 13b in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 57.4 to 13.8.
- Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 24.4 |
| Rank | 139 | 348 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)
- Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 683 |

## Reasoning

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)
- Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 728 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 100.58 |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |

## Math

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)
- Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | 838 |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |

## Knowledge

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| MMLU | — | 47.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |

## Multimodal

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |

## Multilingual

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)
- Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1363 | 819 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | — |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1342 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1368 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)
- Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1344 | 781 |

## Long Context

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1366 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)
- Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1359 | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1387 | 753 |

## FAQ

### Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Llama 13b?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Llama 13b better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Llama 13b share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.