# Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs o3

> o3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.4 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hunyuan-turbo-vs-o3
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher in 0 categories and o3 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where o3 leads 48.9 to 32.9.

## Snapshot

| | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 39.0 | 47.4 |
| Rank | 165 | 53 |
| Context | — | 200K |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $8 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.0 (#168)
- o3: 47.3 (#57)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1320 | 1408 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 62.3% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 58.4% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 81.3% |
| GSO | — | 8.8% |
| WeirdML | — | 52.4% |
| CadEval | — | 74% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 933.55 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
- o3: 34.3 (#42)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 63% |
| GDPval | — | 30.8% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 45.2% |
| OSWorld | — | 23% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1144 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 65.4% |

## Reasoning

- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 25.0 (#135)
- o3: 32.1 (#66)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1308 | 1402 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 6.5% |
| SimpleBench | — | 53.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 67.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 60.8% |
| CritPt | — | 1.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 38% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 13.1% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 29% |
| DTBench | — | 84.8% |
| LMCA | — | 39.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.88 |
| ForecastBench | — | 62.5 |

## Math

- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 32.9 (#180)
- o3: 48.9 (#49)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 1426 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 33.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 71.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 97.8% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 18.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |

## Knowledge

- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
- o3: 54.5 (#47)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 81.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 20.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 49.4% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 85.9% |
| Confabulations | — | 14.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 75.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1403 |

## Multimodal

- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
- o3: 40.7 (#35)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1214 |
| GeoBench | — | 74% |
| VPCT | — | 52% |

## Multilingual

- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.5 (#178)
- o3: 51.9 (#99)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1402 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1358 | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | 1305 | 1407 |
| LMArena French | — | 1430 |
| LMArena German | — | 1420 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1371 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1395 |

## Instruction Following

- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.7 (#190)
- o3: 73.0 (#122)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1279 | 1368 |
| IFEval | — | 86.9% |

## Long Context

- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#163)
- o3: 53.2 (#6)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1309 | 1372 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 88.9% |
| CL-bench | — | 17.8% |

## Writing & Preference

- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.4 (#176)
- o3: 63.7 (#62)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | 1410 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | 1359 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1303 | 1405 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 83.9% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1676 |
| WildBench | — | 86.1% |

## FAQ

### Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than o3?

o3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.4 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 or o3 better for coding?

o3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.3 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and o3 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and o3 has 63.