# Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs MiMo-V2-Pro

> MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hunyuan-turbo-vs-mimo-v2-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2-Pro in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.8 to 50.2.

## Snapshot

| | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 39.6 | 43.0 |
| Rank | 163 | 103 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | 1476 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1433 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |

## Reasoning

- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1308 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |

## Math

- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 1447 |

## Knowledge

- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1478 |

## Multilingual

- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1358 | 1456 |
| LMArena Russian | 1305 | 1427 |
| LMArena French | — | 1469 |
| LMArena German | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1400 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1457 |

## Instruction Following

- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1278 | 1445 |

## Long Context

- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1309 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |

## Writing & Preference

- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1303 | 1456 |

## FAQ

### Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and MiMo-V2-Pro share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.