# Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs Kimi K2.7 Code

> Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hunyuan-turbo-vs-kimi-k2-7-code
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 52.6 to 32.9.
- Kimi K2.7 Code has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 39.0 | 43.0 |
| Rank | 165 | 90 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.95 |
| Output $/M | — | $4 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.0 (#168)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.4 (#92)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 30.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 30.1% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1473 |
| SciCode | — | 47.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 54.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1320 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 886.23 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 23.9 (#115)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 37.6% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,083 |

## Reasoning

- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 25.0 (#135)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 38.2 (#56)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 57.9% |
| CritPt | — | 10% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1308 | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 48.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 150.01 |

## Math

- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 32.9 (#180)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.6 (#39)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 54% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 12.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1273 | — |

## Knowledge

- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.6 (#51)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 36.5% |

## Multilingual

- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.5 (#178)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1305 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.7 (#190)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1279 | — |

## Long Context

- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#163)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1309 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.4 (#176)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1303 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Kimi K2.7 Code share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.