# Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Trinity Large Thinking

> Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hunyuan-t1-vs-trinity-large-thinking
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 7 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 28.5 to 16.9.
- Trinity Large Thinking has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 38.6 |
| Rank | 114 | 185 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1381 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |

## Reasoning

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1350 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |

## Math

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1366 |

## Knowledge

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1360 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |

## Multilingual

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1373 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1306 |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | 1337 |
| LMArena French | — | 1374 |
| LMArena German | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1357 |

## Instruction Following

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | 1334 |

## Long Context

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1355 |

## Writing & Preference

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1320 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1342 |

## FAQ

### Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Trinity Large Thinking share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.