# Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Olmo 3 32b Think

> Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hunyuan-t1-vs-olmo-3-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.5 to 49.1.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 38.7 |
| Rank | 114 | 183 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1319 |

## Reasoning

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1302 |

## Math

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1316 |

## Knowledge

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1273 |

## Multilingual

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1300 |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | 1254 |
| LMArena French | — | 1291 |
| LMArena German | — | 1290 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1296 |

## Writing & Preference

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1290 |

## FAQ

### Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.