# Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs o3

> o3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hunyuan-t1-vs-o3
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 0 categories and o3 in 8 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where o3 leads 54.6 to 38.8.

## Snapshot

| | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 47.5 |
| Rank | 114 | 61 |
| Context | — | 200K |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $8 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)
- o3: 46.8 (#64)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1408 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 62.3% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 58.4% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 81.3% |
| GSO | — | 8.8% |
| WeirdML | — | 52.4% |
| CadEval | — | 74% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 933.55 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
- o3: 34.5 (#44)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 63% |
| GDPval | — | 30.8% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 45.2% |
| OSWorld | — | 23% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1144 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 65.4% |

## Reasoning

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)
- o3: 32.0 (#78)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1402 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 6.5% |
| SimpleBench | — | 53.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 67.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 60.8% |
| CritPt | — | 1.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 38% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 13.1% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 29% |
| DTBench | — | 84.8% |
| LMCA | — | 39.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.86 |
| ForecastBench | — | 62.5 |

## Math

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)
- o3: 50.2 (#58)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1426 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 33.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 71.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 97.8% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 18.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |

## Knowledge

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)
- o3: 54.6 (#52)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1402 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 81.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 20.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 49.4% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 85.9% |
| Confabulations | — | 14.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 75.3% |

## Multimodal

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
- o3: 41.4 (#36)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1214 |
| GeoBench | — | 74% |
| VPCT | — | 52% |

## Multilingual

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)
- o3: 51.7 (#105)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1401 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1437 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1370 |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | 1406 |
| LMArena French | — | 1430 |
| LMArena German | — | 1420 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1403 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1395 |

## Instruction Following

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)
- o3: 72.8 (#127)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | 1368 |
| IFEval | — | 86.9% |

## Long Context

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)
- o3: 53.3 (#6)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1372 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 88.9% |
| CL-bench | — | 17.8% |

## Writing & Preference

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)
- o3: 63.5 (#64)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1410 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1359 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1405 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 83.9% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1676 |
| WildBench | — | 86.1% |

## FAQ

### Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than o3?

o3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or o3 better for coding?

o3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and o3 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and o3 has 63.