# Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Muse Spark

> Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hunyuan-t1-vs-muse-spark
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 38.1.

## Snapshot

| | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 50.3 |
| Rank | 114 | 41 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129)
- Muse Spark: 45.6 (#65)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1389 | 1482 |
| SciCode | — | 51.5% |

## Reasoning

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106)
- Muse Spark: 34.9 (#61)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1475 |
| CritPt | — | 11.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 152.09 |

## Math

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132)
- Muse Spark: 46.8 (#57)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1455 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 88.9% |
| ProofBench | — | 17% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 39% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 14.6% |

## Knowledge

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139)
- Muse Spark: 65.7 (#12)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1458 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 89.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 40.6% |

## Multimodal

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
- Muse Spark: 42.7 (#23)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107)
- Muse Spark: 56.3 (#23)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1464 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1424 | 1507 |
| LMArena Korean | 1403 | 1457 |
| LMArena Russian | 1384 | 1467 |
| LMArena French | — | 1497 |
| LMArena German | — | 1497 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1471 |

## Instruction Following

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130)
- Muse Spark: 76.1 (#47)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | 1443 |

## Long Context

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123)
- Muse Spark: 44.4 (#65)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1451 |

## Writing & Preference

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105)
- Muse Spark: 66.2 (#37)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1474 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1460 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1477 |

## FAQ

### Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Muse Spark?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Muse Spark better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.6 versus 40.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Muse Spark share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.