# Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Inkling-Small

> Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hunyuan-t1-vs-inkling-small
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 0 categories and Inkling-Small in 8 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Inkling-Small leads 39.0 to 27.3.
- Inkling-Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Thinking Machines Lab |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 46.5 |
| Rank | 114 | 57 |
| Context | — | 524K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.45 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129)
- Inkling-Small: 43.3 (#80)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1389 | 1451 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1408 |
| SciCode | — | 48.7% |

## Reasoning

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106)
- Inkling-Small: 39.0 (#53)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1424 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 40.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 84% |
| CritPt | — | 8.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 18% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 150.13 |

## Math

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132)
- Inkling-Small: 44.9 (#65)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1453 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 46.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 17.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 90% |
| ProofBench | — | 6% |

## Knowledge

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139)
- Inkling-Small: 48.3 (#71)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1442 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 88.5% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 19.1% |

## Multimodal

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
- Inkling-Small: 38.4 (#59)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1235 |

## Multilingual

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107)
- Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#102)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1400 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1424 | 1458 |
| LMArena Korean | 1403 | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | 1384 | 1392 |
| LMArena French | — | 1438 |
| LMArena German | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1399 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1426 |

## Instruction Following

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130)
- Inkling-Small: 73.9 (#112)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | 1397 |

## Long Context

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123)
- Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#113)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1401 |

## Writing & Preference

- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105)
- Inkling-Small: 59.8 (#102)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1413 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1330 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1420 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1491 |

## FAQ

### Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Inkling-Small?

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Inkling-Small better for coding?

Inkling-Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 40.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Inkling-Small share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Inkling-Small has 33.