# Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

> Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hunyuan-standard-vs-qwen3-7-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Plus in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 54.9 to 34.2.

## Snapshot

| | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 45.3 |
| Rank | 193 | 72 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.60 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1473 |
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |

## Reasoning

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | 1460 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.37 |

## Math

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1274 | 1466 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |

## Knowledge

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1467 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |

## Multimodal

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | 1510 |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | 1457 |
| LMArena French | — | 1473 |
| LMArena German | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1457 |

## Instruction Following

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1440 |

## Long Context

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | 1455 |

## Writing & Preference

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1460 |

## FAQ

### Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (37.1 vs 36.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.