# Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs phi-3-medium 14B

> Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hunyuan-standard-vs-phi-3-medium-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 33.6 to 9.1.
- phi-3-medium 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 37.2 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 193 | 306 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 36.5 (#192)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 36.3 (#198)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |

## Reasoning

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 23.9 (#157)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.18 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |

## Math

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.0 (#179)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 25.2 (#249)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1274 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |

## Knowledge

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.6 (#192)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#301)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |

## Multilingual

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.9 (#198)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.8 (#214)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | — |

## Long Context

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#168)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.4 (#209)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than phi-3-medium 14B?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (36.5 vs 36.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and phi-3-medium 14B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.