# Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

> Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hunyuan-standard-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 8 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 68.6 to 65.5.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 39.4 |
| Rank | 193 | 168 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1347 |

## Reasoning

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | 1322 |

## Math

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1274 | 1305 |

## Knowledge

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1308 |

## Multilingual

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | 1268 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1336 |

## Instruction Following

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1299 |

## Long Context

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | 1312 |

## Writing & Preference

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1309 |

## FAQ

### Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.