# Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Muse Glimmer

> Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hunyuan-standard-vs-muse-glimmer
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Glimmer leads 57.5 to 47.2.
- Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 41.7 |
| Rank | 193 | 131 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197)
- Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1416 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |

## Reasoning

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154)
- Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | 1396 |
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |

## Math

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179)
- Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1274 | 1417 |

## Knowledge

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197)
- Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1386 |

## Multilingual

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203)
- Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | 1390 |

## Instruction Following

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219)
- Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1375 |

## Long Context

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173)
- Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | 1382 |

## Writing & Preference

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214)
- Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1399 |

## FAQ

### Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Muse Glimmer?

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Muse Glimmer share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.