# Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Mixtral 8x22B

> Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hunyuan-standard-vs-mixtral-8x22b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Mixtral 8x22B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 34.2 to 15.1.
- Mixtral 8x22B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 27.1 |
| Rank | 193 | 333 |
| Context | — | 64K |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197)
- Mixtral 8x22B: 24.2 (#329)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1166 |
| WeirdML | — | 3.2% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 40.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 50.2% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 72% |
| MBPP+ | — | 64.3% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —
- Mixtral 8x22B: 23.1 (#127)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 7.5% |

## Reasoning

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154)
- Mixtral 8x22B: 19.9 (#248)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | 1150 |
| DTBench | — | 55.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 122.03 |
| ForecastBench | — | 56.3 |

## Math

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179)
- Mixtral 8x22B: 22.9 (#275)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1274 | 1184 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 24.2% |

## Knowledge

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197)
- Mixtral 8x22B: 15.1 (#293)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1113 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 34.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 46% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 33.4% |
| MMLU | — | 77.8% |

## Multilingual

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203)
- Mixtral 8x22B: 32.8 (#255)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | 1128 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | 1116 |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | 1158 |
| LMArena French | — | 1166 |
| LMArena German | — | 1141 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1037 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1057 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1151 |

## Instruction Following

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219)
- Mixtral 8x22B: 57.7 (#266)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1147 |
| IFEval | — | 72.4% |

## Long Context

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173)
- Mixtral 8x22B: 34.7 (#247)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | 1144 |

## Writing & Preference

- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214)
- Mixtral 8x22B: 36.9 (#262)

| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | 1162 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1141 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1130 |
| WildBench | — | 71.1% |

## FAQ

### Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Mixtral 8x22B?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Mixtral 8x22B better for coding?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 24.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Mixtral 8x22B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x22B has 34.